The Uncomfortable Art of Staying Open

By Daisy De Boevere

Writer • Intimacy Researcher • Human Design Analyst • Vedic Astrologer • Gene Keys Guide • Musician

Aug 5, 2026

Every second, roughly a hundred trillion neutrinos pass through your body.

These are subatomic particles, moving at nearly the speed of light, carrying information from the sun, the stars, the planets. They pass through walls, through Earth, through everything — including you. And because they carry a tiny amount of mass, they leave a trace. They condition you, continuously, with the frequencies of everything they’ve moved through before arriving.

This is not metaphor. It’s physics. And it’s the foundation of what Human Design calls conditioning — the constant stream of information and energy that moves through us, shaping us, moment by moment, whether we’re aware of it or not.

In this sense, we are never separate from our environment. We are always already in exchange with it. The boundary between Self and world is more permeable than the mind wants to believe.

And nowhere is this more immediate — more felt, more destabilizing, more intimate — than in the presence of another person.

The ghost and the fighter

When I first encountered this in Human Design, my instinct was to fight it.

I wanted to stay in my own energy. To remain centered, grounded, untouched by the pull of other people’s frequencies. Especially in the presence of my family of origin, where I felt most easily swept back into old roles, old feelings, old versions of myself I thought I had left behind. I worked hard at it. I developed strategies. I chose carefully when and how long I would stay.

And I exhausted myself.

Because you cannot fight conditioning. It isn’t an intrusion. It’s the nature of being alive in a body among other bodies. From the moment two auras meet, they begin influencing each other. A new field forms — something larger than either person alone, something neither fully controls. You don’t stay in your own energy when you meet another person. You become part of something that includes them.

What changes is not the conditioning. What changes is your relationship to it.

A teacher I once heard describe it this way: imagine you are a ghost. Transparent. Whatever moves through the space also moves through you. The emotional wave of another person enters and exits. You feel it, fully. And you are not swept away.

That image stayed with me. Not because it describes detachment — it doesn’t. A ghost still feels everything. What it doesn’t do is mistake what it feels for what it is.

What gets stored

The problem isn’t conditioning itself. Conditioning is simply energy in motion — information flowing through us, temporarily shaping what we feel, how we speak, what we reach toward. In its natural form, it arrives and passes. Like weather.

The problem is what happens when it doesn’t pass.

When we’re children, dependent on the people who care for us, we don’t have the capacity to let conditioning flow through. We need to belong. We need to be acceptable. So we learn — quickly, and without knowing we’re learning — which parts of ourselves are welcome and which are not. We adapt. We mold. We adopt the frequencies of the people around us as though they were our own, because survival requires it.

Those adaptations don’t stay as behaviors. They become identity. By the time we’re adults, most of us are operating from a version of ourselves that is part original nature and part accumulated conditioning, and we can’t easily tell which is which.

This is what the body stores. Not just memories. Not just patterns of thinking. But frozen responses: energy that was never allowed to complete its movement. The child who needed to cry and couldn’t. The teenager who needed to say ‘no’ and learned it wasn’t safe. The adult who wanted to leave a room, a relationship, a life, and stayed because the cost of leaving felt unsurvivable.

All of it held in the tissue. Waiting for another expression, another chance at being seen, felt, and held, before its final release.

Where it surfaces

It surfaces in relationship. Almost always in relationship.
Because relationship is where the oldest conditioning was formed and where it gets reactivated most reliably. Not always through dramatic events. Sometimes through something as small as a tone of voice. A particular silence. Someone turning away at the wrong moment, or not turning toward you when you needed it.

Before you’ve consciously registered what happened, the body has already responded. The nervous system has already classified this situation as familiar and threatening and reached for the survival strategy that worked once, decades ago, in a completely different context.

And here is what makes it so disorienting: the response feels true. It feels like accurate perception. The urgency, the withdrawal, the need to manage, fix, or flee — it doesn’t feel like old conditioning. It feels like the present moment, clearly seen.

This is why Human Design’s invitation to follow your inner Authority is harder than it sounds. Your Authority lives in the body. And the body is also where the conditioning lives. For most people, especially in relationship, the signal and the noise occupy the same frequency.

A Generator might follow what feels like a Sacral ‘yes’ only to realize, much later, that it was a trauma response dressed as enthusiasm. Someone with Splenic Authority might miss the quiet signal entirely because the nervous system’s alarm is so much louder. Someone with emotional Authority might mistake the wave of longing or fear for clarity, because both feel urgent and live in the chest.

This is not a flaw in the system. It’s an honest account of how difficult it is to inhabit a body shaped by a lifetime of adaptation.

The Hero’s Journey is not about arriving somewhere safe

I used to think the journey of deconditioning — of peeling back the layers, of returning to something more essentially true — was a journey toward stability. Toward a self that could finally rest. That would no longer be destabilized by contact with others.

I don’t think that anymore.

What I think now is that the journey is toward something more like permeability without dissolution. The capacity to be genuinely moved — by grief, by love, by the reality of another person — without losing the thread back to yourself. Not less feeling. More of it, with less need to manage what you feel.

The Hero’s Journey, in the original myth, is never about arriving somewhere safe. It’s about descending into the most frightening territory and discovering that you can survive contact with it. And then returning — changed, humbled, more real — to offer something to others that only the descent could have produced.

In the intimacy version of that journey, the descent is into your own conditioning. Into the places where the body learned to protect itself by closing. And the return — the thing that only the descent makes possible — is the capacity to stay open anyway. Not because the fear is gone. Because something larger than the fear has become available.

I know this not as a concept but as something I have lived, incompletely and imperfectly, over many years.

There was a time when I would have called myself someone who valued connection above almost everything. And I was — genuinely. But underneath that valuing was a terror so old I didn’t know it was there. A terror of being too much. Of asking for more than I was allowed. Of the connection disappearing if I took up the wrong kind of space.

So, I learned to manage. To read the room. To shrink strategically so that people would stay. And I called it caring about others. And it was, in part. But it was also armor. And the armor kept me safe and kept me alone in the same movement.

The deconditioning didn’t happen through understanding this. Understanding came later, as the mind’s way of making sense of what had already shifted in the body. The shift happened through loss — through the particular violence of having the life I had carefully constructed dismantled overnight, by something I didn’t choose and couldn’t control.

In the wreckage of the deepest betrayal, there was nothing left to manage.

What actually changes

What changes, in genuine deconditioning, is not that the conditioning disappears. Seven years is the number Human Design offers for the cycle of cellular renewal — the minimum time for the body to begin releasing what it has stored. In practice, it seems closer to a lifetime, with windows of acceleration and stretches of consolidation.

What changes is the relationship to the conditioning.
You begin to catch the old pattern. Not always, but sometimes, just before it takes over, and that sometimes is everything. Because in that space, however small, something other than the conditioned response becomes possible.

You notice the familiar contraction in the chest before the defensive words arrive. You notice the urge to disappear from a conversation that has touched something old and tender. You notice the automatic reaching for reassurance, or for distance, or for any of the hundred small ways the body learned to manage the unbearable possibility of not being held.

And sometimes — not always — you stay with it instead of acting from it.

This is what “indulging with awareness” means in practice. Not transcending the conditioning. Not bypassing the discomfort. Feeling it fully, and remaining present. Letting it move through rather than move you.

That is the practice of intimacy.
Not the intimacy of perfect understanding between two people who have done all their work. The intimacy of two people who are still in the middle of their own unfolding, choosing, repeatedly and imperfectly, to remain available to each other anyway.

Love as Ra understood it

Ra Uru Hu said something I’ve returned to more times than I can count:

“If you allow someone to be who they are and they allow you to be who you are, then that’s love. Anything else is torture.”

It sounds simple. It is not simple.

Allowing someone to be who they are requires that you are genuinely present with who they actually are, not who you need them to be, not who they were when the conditioning in you decided they were safe or dangerous. It requires that you feel the full weight of another person’s reality without immediately moving to manage it, fix it, or make it fit the story your nervous system has already written.

And allowing yourself to be who you are — in the presence of another person, without armor — is perhaps the most demanding thing there is. Because the conditioning that was formed in relationship is reactivated by relationship, and the body doesn’t always know the difference between then and now.

The most loving act, Ra also said, is to remember who you are.
Not the conditioned self. Not the accumulated layers of adaptation and protection and strategic self-presentation. The thing underneath. Which is still there — has always been there — waiting with extraordinary patience for the layers to thin enough to breathe through.

The open chart

In Human Design, we talk about the defined and undefined parts of a chart. The defined centers — colored in, consistent, what you reliably are. The undefined centers — white, open, conditioned by whoever and whatever you encounter.

Most people fear their openness. They experience it as vulnerability, as instability, as the part of them that gets thrown around by others’ energies. They wish they were more defined. More fixed. More protected.

But the undefined centers are not a weakness. They are how you receive the world. They are where you feel others most deeply, understand them most directly, take in the extraordinary range of what it means to be human. They are the places through which genuine contact becomes possible.

The conditioning enters through the openness. And so does the love.

You cannot have one without the other. The same permeability that makes you susceptible to conditioning is what makes you capable of being genuinely moved by another person. The choice is not between open and protected. It is between open with awareness and open without it.

The Hero’s Journey of intimacy is not the journey toward a closed heart that can no longer be hurt. It is the journey toward an open heart that has learned — slowly, painfully, with many setbacks — to trust its own capacity to return to itself.

To be moved. And to remain.
To be conditioned. And to still know who you are underneath.
To keep the heart open — not because it’s safe, but because that is the only way anything real becomes possible.

Did this resonate with you?

If this touched something in you, you’re welcome to support my work via Buy Me A Coffee:

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *